Blog

In an unprecedented move, United States President Joe Biden recently launched what’s being hailed as the most robust initiative to regulate the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI). Amid rising concerns surrounding the potential implications of AI on facets like national security and public health, this executive order aims to harness the potential of AI while mitigating its risks.

Key Provisions:

1. Transparency and Reporting: Those developing advanced AI systems are mandated to inform the government of their activities and share results from safety tests.
2. Drafting Standards: Bodies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology are entrusted with creating stringent standards for AI, ensuring it undergoes rigorous testing before public deployment.
3. Addressing AI-Generated Content: The Department of Commerce has been tasked with forming guidelines to discern content that has been generated by AI.
4. Biohazard Safeguards: Recognising the potential misuse of AI in biohazard creation, stringent screening standards will be put in place.
5. Emphasising Data Privacy and Tackling Algorithmic Bias: The order underscores the importance of data privacy legislation and the need to counteract algorithmic biases, especially in areas like housing.
6. Global Collaboration: Reflecting the universal nature of AI challenges, the order emphasises strengthening international collaborations for safe AI deployment.

Expert Opinions:

While the order is the U.S.’s most extensive policy on AI, emphasising safety, security, and trust, it’s seen as the start of a longer journey. Experts like Cynthia Rudin from Duke University and Daniel Ho from Stanford, while acknowledging its importance, view it as a precursor to more exhaustive regulations.

AI’s rapid evolution has manifested in real-world challenges, from deepfakes propagating misinformation to ingrained biases in algorithms leading to discriminatory practices. There’s also the ever-present threat to national security, as AI could potentially expedite the creation of chemical weapons. This amplifies the urgency for comprehensive governance.

However, the order isn’t without gaps. It doesn’t cater explicitly to the privacy of biometric data like facial scans. Additionally, while it touches upon mitigating AI bias, experts believe more stringent enforcement mechanisms are needed.

A significant concern is the practical implementation of the order. Given the ambitious timelines, there are doubts regarding federal agencies’ ability to meet these directives. Ho, for instance, points out that previous AI-related executive orders saw less than half of the mandated actions being verifiably implemented.

Lastly, the inherent limitations of executive orders must be noted. Their power is restricted, and they can be easily reversed. Thus, many believe that while the order is a positive step, legislative action is crucial to cement these regulations. The executive order, in essence, serves as a foundation, with the real challenge being subsequent regulatory steps.